What I've noticed is that when growth slows down, business owners don't sit still. They start trying things like a new product line, a different channel, a pricing adjustment, a promotion. Each idea makes sense on its own, but after each idea, revenue isn’t really impacted.
So the next idea comes. And the next. Because the logic is hard to argue with: if this approach didn't work, a different one might. Somewhere in the list of things we haven't tried yet is the one that breaks through.
In my research, I found 48% of business owners move quickly when something isn't working just to help resolve the problem. The 38% who pause first often sense something deeper is off, but don’t have a systematic way to see what it is.
Both impulses make sense. But when we've tried a dozen things and none of them moved the number that matters, something else is happening.
What if the problem isn't that you haven't found the right move yet but that you're going wide when the leverage is in going deep?
THREE WAYS GOING WIDE KEEPS YOU STUCK
This pattern shows up in three places, and they often run simultaneously.
Wide in offerings. New products, new services, new packages. Each one feels like it opens a new revenue path. But when the core offering isn't clearly defined and clearly priced, every addition spreads attention further from the thing with the most potential.
Wide in commitment. A month on this channel, a few weeks on that strategy, a short run at this approach. Nothing gets enough time or focus to produce a real signal. When everything gets 20% effort for eight weeks, we don't learn what works. We learned that nothing worked at 20%.
Wide in audience. Trying to serve anyone who will pay, rather than going deep with the customers the core offering is actually built for. The messaging stays generic because it has to speak to everyone. The positioning stays vague because narrowing feels like leaving money on the table.
WHY WIDTH FEELS LIKE PROGRESS
Here's what makes this hard to see from the inside: each of these moves feels like building. A new product line feels like expansion. A new channel feels like reach. A broader audience feels like opportunity. And any one of them might be the right move, eventually.
But before the core is deep, width doesn't give us leverage. It actually prevents it. Every addition competes with the thing that has the most leverage. And the cost isn't just the failed attempts.
In my research, owners described what I'd call the repeat-attempt cycle. Try solution A, doesn't work. Try solution B, partial improvement. Try solution C. They normalize it as iteration. But it's not iteration when each attempt is in a different domain at surface depth.
The cumulative cost of five or six shallow attempts over a year isn't one bad decision. It's twelve months of spreading thinner while the core stays unvalidated.
TO SEE IF YOU'RE GOING WIDE BEFORE GOING DEEP
How long did your last three growth experiments run before you moved on and was that long enough to produce a real signal?
Is your audience defined specifically enough that you could describe exactly who you serve best, or are you marketing to anyone who might need this?
If you stopped adding for 90 days and went deeper on what already exists, what would you focus on?
Are you spreading across channels because you haven't gone deep enough in one to know if it works?
If you have a revenue goal you're trying to hit and you've been going wider to get there, it might be worth asking what happens if you go in the other direction. Not more experiments. Not another product line. Just depth in the places where depth would actually produce leverage. The width can come later, after the core is strong enough to support it.
Working through a specific challenge in your business? I offer 1:1 sessions to help identify what's going on. → Book a Session